By Miranda Hitti WebMD Medical News
Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD
Oct. 29, 2007 -- HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, may have arrived in the U.S. a dozen years before AIDS was recognized in 1981.
So say scientists including the University of Arizona's Michael Worobey, PhD.
They analyzed HIV DNA saved in 1982-1983 from five AIDS patients who had recently emigrated from Haiti to Miami. Those five Haitians were among the first recognized AIDS patients.
Using a computer program, Worobey's team traced the lineage of the patients' HIV DNA, based on the assumption that HIV spread to the U.S. via Haiti.
They concluded that HIV arrived in Haiti from Africa in 1966, around the time that many Haitian professionals were returning from working in Africa's newly independent Congo.
Worobey and colleagues also estimate that HIV spread from Haiti to the U.S. in 1969 (or at least between 1966 and 1972).
HIV "was circulating in one of the most medically sophisticated settings in the world for more than a decade before AIDS was recognized," the researchers conclude.
The researchers acknowledge that their calculations could be wrong. Scientists don't know the precise origins of HIV.
They speculate that HIV "may well have been spreading slowly for an extensive period, perhaps in the heterosexual population, before entering the highest risk men-who-have-sex-with-men subpopulation, where it spread explosively enough to finally be noticed."
Their findings appear in this week's early online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Thursday, November 1, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
AIDS doesn't equal to the HIV. If a person get the HIV virus, it will after a long time before the person become a AIDS patient. So it is possible that the HIV have reached the U.S. 12 years before AIDS recognition. I got the HIV about 10 years before I become an AIDS patient. I meet many friends on a site called positivesingles.com. Many of them have the same situation with me.
This definitely baseless. To me this research is simply political if not some sort of greedyness from the part of scientist who's trying to make a name for himself by publishing this stupid research. In any statistical test data, you need to have a random test not just with one group of people but many. If you start with one Haitian, you will definitely end up with a high rate of probability among Haitians. I am surprised he has not said the result were 100% accurate. This is so silly and we should not endure this stigmazation all over again.
Have you read the paper andrew? It is freely downloadable (which means the researcher spent alot of his money to make it so) for all to read.
search the web, read the results, understand the science before you pass judgement.
science is apolitical it is silly people that make it political.
(either with ugliness against haitians or ugliness against scientists-both are WRONG)
Post a Comment